3 movies: Pan’s Labyrinth, Baghban, Transporter (2)

<<<<<<<SPOILER ALERT>>>>>>> 

Svend and I are hopelessly behind in our movie-watching, so we don’t even try to keep up with them as they come out. Still, I try to regularly expose my own inability to keep up with cultural developments by providing rough and ready reviews of books and movies. If you wish to avoid spoilers, – well, don’t read the reviews.


*PAN’S LABYRINTH: This was the best movie I’ve seen in a while. It’s set in Franco’s Spain, and involves the rebel forces and some military skirmishes, but a young girl of about 10 is the central character. She is immersed in the world of books and fairytales, many of them quite dark and somber, and they become her reality in a dark and yet hopeful way. Do not watch this with children, and if you have a sensitive heart or weak stomach, keep the remote handy throughout. There are some very sudden violent scenes in this movie, which are very regrettable. Without them, it could easily have been a great movie for adults and kids. The violence could not only have been veiled, it could have been less gruesome. Except for that, it’s a deeply moving movie for lovers of fantasy and non-fantasy.  Spanish with English subtitles.

*THE TRANSPORTER 2: With embarrassment I admit that I’m an occasional lover of action. I have watched Die Hard many times and when faced with a choice, will pick an action-thriller over a romance or comedy or drama ANY day. Readers may judge me as shallow for this, but I do not approach movies to give me a “slice of life.” Life is sufficient for that purpose. So yes, I enjoyed “The Transporter.” I like Jason Statham’s poker face and his cool, professional, generally unemotional demeanour in that movie. So it was with high hopes that I ordered the sequel on netflix. Big mistake to have hopes of a sequel. In my book, it’s a dud. It screams implausible. Yes, movies are not supposed to be, strictly speaking, “realistic.” But the viewer and the producer have a deal: don’t make it so far away from “realistic” as to insult the viewer’s intelligence. The action, the plot, the characters are implausible. Statham’s character is mawkish from the very start. Not only is he driving a cutesy little kid around (I do NOT sound like a mother, I know) but he is a little too cutesy, and not particularly childlike – he is constantly chattering with the kid, making him promises and telling him to trust him like Amitabh out of the 80’s Bollywood movies. Quite unnecessary, and disappointing for the character. Not just that – but the kid’s mother, within 5 minutes of the movie, appears, and the romantic and sexual tension causes the viewer to depart with her barf-bag in disgust. The Transporter, in other words, has left the building. The worst feature of the movie is the vamp, who does most of the fighting on the part of the unpleasant villain – unpleasant not in an Alan Rickman as terrorist sense, but in an “ew, you’re not watchable on the screen” sense. Rickman as Hans the terrorist is eminently watchable. The villain in this movie is not. The vamp is created for an adolescent audience. She never appears unless she is either naked or dressed in the trashiest Victoria’s Secret has to offer. She fights, runs and jumps in 6″ stilettoes, bras and little boyshorts. It’s uncomfortable to watch, and though probably appealing to a 14 year old boy, reduces everyone else to tears and nausea.

*BAGHBAN: Most readers of my blog know that I am a lover of old desi movies. I rarely watch modern desi stuff, and mostly I wonder if I’m really missing some gems. So I ordered “Baghban” on netflix. I was hard-pressed to think of an old movie that was so heavy-handed as this one. Amitabh and Hema Malini are a loving “elderly” couple, but their love is carried on and on and on to the point of nausea. Plus this movie is a nonstop opportunity for them to not only be the elderly objects of reverence for the younger generation, but also the hot kids on the dance floor. I remember at least 3 annoying numbers when the Hema tucked in her fancy silk sari and hit the floor, and Amitabh started jigging with 6 guys behind him – and they’re supposed to be 60+ with grownup married sons. The disrespectful and nasty treatment by the sons is overdone. The picture of benevolent patriarchy is, as was expected, perfect. And it is patriarchy. The father (Amitabh) is at the center of the storyline, and the mother sort of gets kicked around without getting much credit. The movie is also schizophrenic on its treatment of Western-style modernity. Hema/grandma disapproves of her young granddaughter going out with her boyfriend, yet the boy in America (Salman Khan) cavorts with a miniskirted girlfriend (and that’s all great, say the “parents:” as long as she’s pretty). There is a schizophrenic juxtaposition of dance scenes: badbad granddaughter bopping in a Western-style nightclub, and Amitabh (hero) celebrating Valentine’s Day with a team of youngsters dressed and dancing as if they were in a trashy MTV piece. One is bad, the other is good – and why one or the other? BTW that Valentine’s Day sequence with teddy bears and “will you be my valentine,” all set in an Indian cafe, is sad. The mistreated father becomes a famous Booker Prize winner author, gets hundreds of thousands of rupees, and doesn’t want to look at his sons again. Salman Khan is the growup orphan whose education was financed by the kindness of Amitabh: his canned filial piety is delivered with all the natural emotion of an axe-murderer. His perpetual worship (no exaggeration: he and his wife go for their morning prayers and address Amitabh and Hema’s photograph) weighs heavy upon the nerves: perhaps the heavy-handed unnaturalness of the devotion would be salvaged by a bit of humour, or other emotion.  

7 Replies to “3 movies: Pan’s Labyrinth, Baghban, Transporter (2)”

  1. lol.i totally agree wid ur review about baghban.its so mushy mushy that one cant watch it for more than 30 mins.n needless to say it was a blockbuster.

  2. i totally agree vun hunderd parsent about pan’s labyrinth! i only got an “okay” out of hubby, and a friend borrowed it and fell asleep in it. but i was mesmerized, even though repelled by the sudden scenes of violence you described… felt exactly the same, that it could have been a beautiful kids’ movie withoutthose scenes. except… the whole idea of her having to die to rejoin her father in the underworld – it makes sense for the story, but it’s so sad… i loved this movie!

  3. I rarely watch hindi movies these days too(been so long since I used to watch regularly, btw, we got 2 free bollywood movies on weekends on tv). I was *introduced* to Transporter by dh, coz he liked the first one. He can’t wait to watch *war*, it’s the latest one with the same transporter guy and jet li, yes, I watch action movies too. Pan’s labyrinth, well, it was so-so. Last weekend I watched shooter(Mark Walhberg?), am a big fan of his 😉
    Baghban, well, I did see it when they had it on the *free* movie wknd and I agree with your thoughts. It’s strange how bollywood movies are still *stuck* on the same plot. I can’t stand salman khan, so his act was just *ewwww*. I guess I would never understand it. There’s a bollywood movie being shot at a community centre near my place, since I don’t know the new actors, someone told me it’s an actress who was in a movie munnabhai(?).

  4. I knew you’d like Pan’s Labyrinth, Ayesha.

    pram, sf, and umarah: I think the thing with Baghban that makes it so popular is its romanticizing and idealizing of filial traditions. These traditions – which I value deeply – are not “pure” but mixed, and have many gaping flaws in practice. But we postcolonials like to become “whole” by imaginatively imposing an idealized pure tradition over our “mixed” realities.

    I must confess that I had a serious bout of filial guilt after Baghban, so I grant that it is a psychologically powerful movie for desis. But it is dreadfully overdone and heavy-handed. I can use a steady dose of filial guilt, but this was just excessive.

  5. This may be a surprise but we watched and enjoyed Baghban also.
    Yes, agree with “overdoing” by sons but I believe that is done ‘purposely’ to exaggearte and thus enhance the point being made
    barha bhi daitay hain kucch zaib-e-dastan kay liyae
    Considering hindi movies over doing or exaggeration is kind of ‘normal’.
    Tumhari mumanijan agar movie dekhain to smajhlo aik bara waqiya ho giya.
    Like you I am restricted to old movies . Cant get used to new culture of bollywood

  6. I watched *snakes on plane* last night. LOL! Imagine if that movie was shown on the plane!!! I had nothing to watch and it was on, well, let’s say, it got me scared there, am not fond of snakes. 😦

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s